Angola vs Burkina Faso: Universal right to vote

Angola
2
in 2025
Burkina Faso
2
in 2025
Angola rank
1st
Burkina Faso rank
1st

Universal right to vote over time

  • Angola
  • Burkina Faso
00.511.52188519552025

How they compare

Angola currently reports 2 against 2 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.

Across all 92 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Burkina Faso Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0.6 0.6 Burkina Faso
1960s 0 2 2 Burkina Faso
1970s 1 2 1 Burkina Faso
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote, Angola or Burkina Faso?
Angola, at 2 against 2 in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote between Angola and Burkina Faso?
0, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Burkina Faso?
92 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
How do Angola and Burkina Faso rank globally for universal right to vote?
Angola ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.