Saint Lucia vs Tajikistan: Universal right to vote in practice

Saint Lucia
2
in 2025
Tajikistan
2
in 2025
Saint Lucia rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote in practice over time

  • Saint Lucia
  • Tajikistan
00.511.52186819462025

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 2 against 2 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Saint Lucia ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Lucia Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1950s 0 2 2 Tajikistan
1960s 0.6 2 1.4 Tajikistan
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 1.8 0.2 Saint Lucia
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Saint Lucia or Tajikistan?
Saint Lucia, at 2 against 2 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Saint Lucia and Tajikistan?
0, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Tajikistan?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Saint Lucia and Tajikistan rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
Saint Lucia ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote in practice
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).