Luxembourg vs Pakistan: Universal right to vote in practice

Luxembourg
2
in 2025
Pakistan
2
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
1st
Pakistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote in practice over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Pakistan
00.511.52181519202025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 2 against 2 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 79 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Pakistan Difference Ahead
1940s 2 0 2 Luxembourg
1950s 2 0.4 1.6 Luxembourg
1960s 2 1.4 0.6 Luxembourg
1970s 2 0.8 1.2 Luxembourg
1980s 2 1 1 Luxembourg
1990s 2 1.8 0.2 Luxembourg
2000s 2 0.4 1.6 Luxembourg
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Luxembourg or Pakistan?
Luxembourg, at 2 against 2 in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Luxembourg and Pakistan?
0, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Pakistan?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Luxembourg and Pakistan rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote in practice
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).