Lebanon vs Pakistan: Universal right to vote in practice

Lebanon
2
in 2025
Pakistan
2
in 2025
Lebanon rank
1st
Pakistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote in practice over time

  • Lebanon
  • Pakistan
00.511.52191819712025

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 2 against 2 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 79 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Lebanon ahead.

Lebanon ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Pakistan Difference Ahead
1940s 1 0 1 Lebanon
1950s 1.8 0.4 1.4 Lebanon
1960s 2 1.4 0.6 Lebanon
1970s 1.2 0.8 0.4 Lebanon
1980s 0 1 1 Pakistan
1990s 1.6 1.8 0.2 Pakistan
2000s 2 0.4 1.6 Lebanon
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Lebanon or Pakistan?
Lebanon, at 2 against 2 in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Lebanon and Pakistan?
0, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Pakistan?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Lebanon and Pakistan rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
Lebanon ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote in practice
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).