Latvia vs Tajikistan: Universal right to vote in practice

Latvia
2
in 2025
Tajikistan
2
in 2025
Latvia rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote in practice over time

  • Latvia
  • Tajikistan
00.511.52186819462025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 2 against 2 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Latvia ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 2 0 2 Latvia
1930s 0.8 0.8 0 β€”
1940s 2 2 0 β€”
1950s 2 2 0 β€”
1960s 2 2 0 β€”
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 1.8 0.2 Latvia
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Latvia or Tajikistan?
Latvia, at 2 against 2 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Latvia and Tajikistan?
0, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tajikistan?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Tajikistan rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
Latvia ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote in practice
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).