Iraq vs Tajikistan: Universal right to vote in practice

Iraq
2
in 2025
Tajikistan
2
in 2025
Iraq rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote in practice over time

  • Iraq
  • Tajikistan
00.511.52186819462025

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 2 against 2 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.

Across all 106 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.

Iraq ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0.8 0.8 Tajikistan
1940s 0 2 2 Tajikistan
1950s 0 2 2 Tajikistan
1960s 0 2 2 Tajikistan
1970s 0 2 2 Tajikistan
1980s 0 2 2 Tajikistan
1990s 1 1.8 0.8 Tajikistan
2000s 1.6 2 0.4 Tajikistan
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Iraq or Tajikistan?
Iraq, at 2 against 2 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Iraq and Tajikistan?
0, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Tajikistan?
106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
How do Iraq and Tajikistan rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
Iraq ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote in practice
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).