Cambodia vs Pakistan: Universal right to vote in practice

Cambodia
2
in 2025
Pakistan
2
in 2025
Cambodia rank
1st
Pakistan rank
1st

Universal right to vote in practice over time

  • Cambodia
  • Pakistan
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 2 against 2 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 79 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Pakistan ahead.

Cambodia ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0.8 0.4 0.4 Cambodia
1960s 2 1.4 0.6 Cambodia
1970s 1.2 0.8 0.4 Cambodia
1980s 1.8 1 0.8 Cambodia
1990s 2 1.8 0.2 Cambodia
2000s 2 0.4 1.6 Cambodia
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Cambodia or Pakistan?
Cambodia, at 2 against 2 in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Cambodia and Pakistan?
0, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Pakistan?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Cambodia and Pakistan rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
Cambodia ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote in practice
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).