Armenia vs Dominica: Universal right to vote in practice

Armenia
2
in 2025
Dominica
2
in 2025
Armenia rank
1st
Dominica rank
1st

Universal right to vote in practice over time

  • Armenia
  • Dominica
00.511.52192219732025

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 2 against 2 in Dominica, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 102 shared years of data; in 1924 it was Dominica ahead.

Armenia ranks 1st and Dominica ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Dominica Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0.8 0 0.8 Armenia
1940s 2 0 2 Armenia
1950s 2 0 2 Armenia
1960s 2 0.6 1.4 Armenia
1970s 2 2 0 β€”
1980s 2 2 0 β€”
1990s 2 2 0 β€”
2000s 2 2 0 β€”
2010s 2 2 0 β€”
2020s 2 2 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal right to vote in practice, Armenia or Dominica?
Armenia, at 2 against 2 in Dominica as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal right to vote in practice between Armenia and Dominica?
0, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Dominica?
102 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2025.
How do Armenia and Dominica rank globally for universal right to vote in practice?
Armenia ranks 1st and Dominica ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote in practice. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal right to vote in practice
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether virtually all adult citizens have the right to vote in practice (score 2), only men have broad voting rights in practice (score 1), or there are no broad voting rights in practice (score 0).