Nauru vs Zimbabwe: UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access
Nauru
72
in 2023
Zimbabwe
71
in 2023
Nauru rank
108th
Zimbabwe rank
110th
UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access over time
- Nauru
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 72 against 71 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 193 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74 | 43.5 | 30.5 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 73 | 54.2 | 18.8 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 71.5 | 67.25 | 4.25 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher uhc service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access, Nauru or Zimbabwe?
- Nauru, at 72 against 71 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in uhc service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access between Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 1, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Zimbabwe rank globally for uhc service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access?
- Nauru ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO) [WHO], published as UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access is based on three tracer indicators (i) hospital access, (ii) health workforce, (iii) health security. It is presented on a scale of 0 to 100 index points and is one of the four sub-indexes underlaying the overall UHC service coverage index.