Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access

Ecuador
71
in 2023
Zimbabwe
71
in 2023
Ecuador rank
110th
Zimbabwe rank
110th

UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 71 against 71 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 193 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 52.9 43.5 9.4 Ecuador
2010s 71.1 54.2 16.9 Ecuador
2020s 72.5 67.25 5.25 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher uhc service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Ecuador, at 71 against 71 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in uhc service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for uhc service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access?
Ecuador ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO) [WHO], published as UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access
Source
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO) [WHO]
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,920 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access is based on three tracer indicators (i) hospital access, (ii) health workforce, (iii) health security. It is presented on a scale of 0 to 100 index points and is one of the four sub-indexes underlaying the overall UHC service coverage index.