Costa Rica vs Republic of Korea: UHC service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and
UHC service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and over time
- Costa Rica
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 84 against 84 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 29th and Republic of Korea ranks 29th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.3 | 81.6 | 0.7 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 83.2 | 83 | 0.2 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 83.75 | 84 | 0.25 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher uhc service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and, Costa Rica or Republic of Korea?
- Costa Rica, at 84 against 84 in Republic of Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in uhc service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and between Costa Rica and Republic of Korea?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Republic of Korea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Republic of Korea rank globally for uhc service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and?
- Costa Rica ranks 29th and Republic of Korea ranks 29th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO), published as UHC service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
UHC service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal,?newborn?and child health services is based on four tracer indicators: (i) family planning, (ii) pregnancy care, (iii) child immunization, (iv) child treatment. It is presented on a scale of 0 to 100 index points and is one of the four sub-indexes underlaying the overall UHC service coverage index.