East Asia & Pacific vs Japan: UHC service coverage index

East Asia & Pacific
80
in 2023
Japan
86
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
10th
Japan rank
12th

UHC service coverage index over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Japan
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 86 against 80 in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 6.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 10th and Japan ranks 12th of 47 groups.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 66.2 78.4 12.2 Japan
2010s 75.2 82.4 7.2 Japan
2020s 79.75 85 5.25 Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher uhc service coverage index, East Asia & Pacific or Japan?
Japan, at 86 against 80 in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in uhc service coverage index between East Asia & Pacific and Japan?
6, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Japan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Japan rank globally for uhc service coverage index?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 10th and Japan ranks 12th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO), published as UHC service coverage index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
UHC service coverage index
Source
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 5,760 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

A composite index representing coverage of essential health services based on 14 tracer indicators in the areas of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, infectious diseases, noncommunicable diseases and service capacity and access. It is presented on a scale of 0 to 100 index points.