Chile vs Latvia: Tree cover loss
Chile
47,606
in 2024
Latvia
56,604
in 2024
Chile rank
56th
Latvia rank
54th
Tree cover loss over time
- Chile
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 56,604 against 47,606 in Chile, a difference of 8,998.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 54th of 197 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93,935 | 31,748 | 62,188 | Chile |
| 2010s | 117,251 | 41,437 | 75,814 | Chile |
| 2020s | 72,909 | 53,409 | 19,501 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Chile or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 56,604 against 47,606 in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Chile and Latvia?
- 8,998, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Chile ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 54th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.