Chile vs Latvia: Tree cover loss
Chile
47,606 hectares
in 2024
Latvia
56,604 hectares
in 2024
Chile rank
56th
Latvia rank
54th
Tree cover loss over time
- Chile
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 56,604 hectares against 47,606 hectares in Chile, a difference of 8,998 hectares.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 54th of 197 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93,935 hectares | 31,748 hectares | 62,188 hectares | Chile |
| 2010s | 117,251 hectares | 41,437 hectares | 75,814 hectares | Chile |
| 2020s | 72,909 hectares | 53,409 hectares | 19,501 hectares | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Chile or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 56,604 hectares against 47,606 hectares in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Chile and Latvia?
- 8,998 hectares, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Chile ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 54th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss driven by all causes.