Belgium vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss
Belgium
6,066 hectares
in 2024
Zimbabwe
5,821 hectares
in 2024
Belgium rank
92nd
Zimbabwe rank
93rd
Tree cover loss over time
- Belgium
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 6,066 hectares against 5,821 hectares in Zimbabwe, a difference of 245 hectares.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Belgium ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 197 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,210 hectares | 10,153 hectares | 5,943 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 5,100 hectares | 11,525 hectares | 6,425 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 6,572 hectares | 6,970 hectares | 397.51 hectares | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Belgium or Zimbabwe?
- Belgium, at 6,066 hectares against 5,821 hectares in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 245 hectares, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Belgium ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss driven by all causes.