Aruba vs San Marino: Tree cover loss
Aruba
0 hectares
in 2024
San Marino
0.1673 hectares
in 2024
Aruba rank
184th
San Marino rank
182nd
Tree cover loss over time
- Aruba
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 0.1673 hectares against 0 hectares in Aruba, a difference of 0.1673 hectares.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was San Marino ahead.
Aruba ranks 184th and San Marino ranks 182nd of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1837 hectares | 0.1301 hectares | 0.0536 hectares | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.0301 hectares | 0.0781 hectares | 0.048 hectares | San Marino |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0.1116 hectares | 0.1116 hectares | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Aruba or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 0.1673 hectares against 0 hectares in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Aruba and San Marino?
- 0.1673 hectares, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and San Marino?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and San Marino rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Aruba ranks 184th and San Marino ranks 182nd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss driven by all causes.