Aruba vs Malta: Tree cover loss
Aruba
0 hectares
in 2024
Malta
0 hectares
in 2024
Aruba rank
184th
Malta rank
184th
Tree cover loss over time
- Aruba
- Malta
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Malta, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malta ahead.
Aruba ranks 184th and Malta ranks 184th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1837 hectares | 0.2157 hectares | 0.032 hectares | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.0301 hectares | 0.025 hectares | 0.005 hectares | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Aruba or Malta?
- Aruba, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Aruba and Malta?
- 0 hectares, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Aruba ranks 184th and Malta ranks 184th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss driven by all causes.