Aruba vs British Virgin Islands: Tree cover loss
Aruba
0 hectares
in 2024
British Virgin Islands
0.0731 hectares
in 2024
Aruba rank
184th
British Virgin Islands rank
183rd
Tree cover loss over time
- Aruba
- British Virgin Islands
How they compare
British Virgin Islands currently reports 0.0731 hectares against 0 hectares in Aruba, a difference of 0.0731 hectares.
Across all 24 years both countries report, British Virgin Islands has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 184th and British Virgin Islands ranks 183rd of 197 countries.
British Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | British Virgin Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1837 hectares | 3.43 hectares | 3.24 hectares | British Virgin Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0301 hectares | 25.63 hectares | 25.6 hectares | British Virgin Islands |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 1.56 hectares | 1.56 hectares | British Virgin Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Aruba or British Virgin Islands?
- British Virgin Islands, at 0.0731 hectares against 0 hectares in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Aruba and British Virgin Islands?
- 0.0731 hectares, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and British Virgin Islands?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and British Virgin Islands rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Aruba ranks 184th and British Virgin Islands ranks 183rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss driven by all causes.