Kenya vs Serbia: Tree cover loss from wildfires
Kenya
87.2 hectares
in 2024
Serbia
86.79 hectares
in 2024
Kenya rank
91st
Serbia rank
92nd
Tree cover loss from wildfires over time
- Kenya
- Serbia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 87.2 hectares against 86.79 hectares in Serbia, a difference of 0.41 hectares.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Serbia ahead.
Kenya ranks 91st and Serbia ranks 92nd of 152 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.85 hectares | 68.95 hectares | 48.1 hectares | Serbia |
| 2010s | 97.27 hectares | 174.76 hectares | 77.49 hectares | Serbia |
| 2020s | 68.4 hectares | 98.3 hectares | 29.9 hectares | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss from wildfires, Kenya or Serbia?
- Kenya, at 87.2 hectares against 86.79 hectares in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss from wildfires between Kenya and Serbia?
- 0.41 hectares, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Serbia rank globally for tree cover loss from wildfires?
- Kenya ranks 91st and Serbia ranks 92nd of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss from wildfires. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss due to fire with no visible human conversion or agricultural activity afterward. Fires may be started by natural causes (e.g. lightning) or may be related to human activities (accidental or deliberate).