South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
South Sudan
25.73
in 2024
Zimbabwe
29.41
in 2024
South Sudan rank
117th
Zimbabwe rank
116th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 29.41 against 25.73 in South Sudan, a difference of 3.68.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 421.77 | 30.38 | 391.38 | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 139.51 | 34.21 | 105.31 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 24.62 | 40.94 | 16.32 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 29.41 against 25.73 in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 3.68, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
- South Sudan ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.