Reunion vs Tajikistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver

Reunion
0.2879 hectares
in 2016
Tajikistan
0.2997 hectares
in 2014
Reunion rank
172nd
Tajikistan rank
171st

Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time

  • Reunion
  • Tajikistan
0510152025200120082016

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 0.2997 hectares against 0.2879 hectares in Reunion, a difference of 0.0118 hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Reunion ahead.

Reunion ranks 172nd and Tajikistan ranks 171st of 186 countries.

Reunion has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Reunion Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 4.54 hectares 1.38 hectares 3.17 hectares Reunion
2010s 17.48 hectares 0.1641 hectares 17.31 hectares Reunion

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Reunion or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 0.2997 hectares against 0.2879 hectares in Reunion as of 2014.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Reunion and Tajikistan?
0.0118 hectares, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Reunion and Tajikistan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
How do Reunion and Tajikistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
Reunion ranks 172nd and Tajikistan ranks 171st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 4,195 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.