New Zealand vs Serbia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver

New Zealand
99.42
in 2024
Serbia
98.45
in 2024
New Zealand rank
86th
Serbia rank
87th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time

  • New Zealand
  • Serbia
0100200300400500200120122024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 99.42 against 98.45 in Serbia, a difference of 0.97.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 86th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 321.12 32.48 288.64 New Zealand
2010s 230.49 69.73 160.76 New Zealand
2020s 147.29 107 40.3 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, New Zealand or Serbia?
New Zealand, at 99.42 against 98.45 in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between New Zealand and Serbia?
0.97, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Serbia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
New Zealand ranks 86th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 4,195 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed