Morocco vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Morocco
30.13 hectares
in 2024
Zimbabwe
29.41 hectares
in 2024
Morocco rank
113th
Zimbabwe rank
116th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time
- Morocco
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 30.13 hectares against 29.41 hectares in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.72 hectares.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Morocco ahead.
Morocco ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.73 hectares | 30.38 hectares | 16.34 hectares | Morocco |
| 2010s | 25.67 hectares | 34.21 hectares | 8.54 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 16.91 hectares | 40.94 hectares | 24.04 hectares | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Morocco or Zimbabwe?
- Morocco, at 30.13 hectares against 29.41 hectares in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Morocco and Zimbabwe?
- 0.72 hectares, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Morocco and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
- Morocco ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.