Mayotte vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Mayotte
30.1 hectares
in 2024
Zimbabwe
29.41 hectares
in 2024
Mayotte rank
114th
Zimbabwe rank
116th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time
- Mayotte
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 30.1 hectares against 29.41 hectares in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.69 hectares.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mayotte ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mayotte | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.65 hectares | 30.38 hectares | 25.74 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 18.83 hectares | 33.83 hectares | 15 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 12.34 hectares | 40.94 hectares | 28.6 hectares | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Mayotte or Zimbabwe?
- Mayotte, at 30.1 hectares against 29.41 hectares in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Mayotte and Zimbabwe?
- 0.69 hectares, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Zimbabwe?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Mayotte and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
- Mayotte ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.