Lebanon vs Singapore: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Lebanon
49.1 hectares
in 2024
Singapore
54.84 hectares
in 2024
Lebanon rank
102nd
Singapore rank
100th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time
- Lebanon
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 54.84 hectares against 49.1 hectares in Lebanon, a difference of 5.74 hectares.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 102nd and Singapore ranks 100th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.82 hectares | 48.09 hectares | 17.74 hectares | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 57.66 hectares | 128.56 hectares | 70.9 hectares | Singapore |
| 2020s | 49.23 hectares | 93.69 hectares | 44.46 hectares | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Lebanon or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 54.84 hectares against 49.1 hectares in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Lebanon and Singapore?
- 5.74 hectares, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Singapore?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and Singapore rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
- Lebanon ranks 102nd and Singapore ranks 100th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.