Latvia vs Serbia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Latvia
98.43 hectares
in 2024
Serbia
98.45 hectares
in 2024
Latvia rank
88th
Serbia rank
87th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 98.45 hectares against 98.43 hectares in Latvia, a difference of 0.02 hectares.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 88th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.64 hectares | 32.48 hectares | 68.16 hectares | Latvia |
| 2010s | 82.28 hectares | 69.73 hectares | 12.55 hectares | Latvia |
| 2020s | 121.71 hectares | 107 hectares | 14.71 hectares | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 98.45 hectares against 98.43 hectares in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Latvia and Serbia?
- 0.02 hectares, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
- Latvia ranks 88th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.