Latvia vs New Zealand: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Latvia
98.43
in 2024
New Zealand
99.42
in 2024
Latvia rank
88th
New Zealand rank
86th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time
- Latvia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 99.42 against 98.43 in Latvia, a difference of 0.99.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Zealand ahead.
Latvia ranks 88th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 186 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.64 | 321.12 | 220.48 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 82.28 | 230.49 | 148.21 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 121.71 | 147.29 | 25.59 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Latvia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 99.42 against 98.43 in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Latvia and New Zealand?
- 0.99, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and New Zealand rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
- Latvia ranks 88th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.