Italy vs Tanzania: Tree cover loss by dominant driver

Italy
838.13 hectares
in 2024
Tanzania
790.64 hectares
in 2024
Italy rank
25th
Tanzania rank
26th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time

  • Italy
  • Tanzania
01.0k2.0k3.0k200120122024

How they compare

Italy currently reports 838.13 hectares against 790.64 hectares in Tanzania, a difference of 47.49 hectares.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Tanzania ahead.

Italy ranks 25th and Tanzania ranks 26th of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 737.65 hectares 1,788 hectares 1,050 hectares Tanzania
2010s 593.2 hectares 1,420 hectares 827.08 hectares Tanzania
2020s 708.45 hectares 684.4 hectares 24.05 hectares Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Italy or Tanzania?
Italy, at 838.13 hectares against 790.64 hectares in Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Italy and Tanzania?
47.49 hectares, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Tanzania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Italy and Tanzania rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
Italy ranks 25th and Tanzania ranks 26th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 4,195 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.