Equatorial Guinea vs Zambia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Equatorial Guinea
222.3 hectares
in 2024
Zambia
228.8 hectares
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
61st
Zambia rank
59th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 228.8 hectares against 222.3 hectares in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 6.5 hectares.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 59th of 186 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 376.84 hectares | 186.69 hectares | 190.15 hectares | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 641.37 hectares | 342.64 hectares | 298.72 hectares | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 217.89 hectares | 217.14 hectares | 0.7442 hectares | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Equatorial Guinea or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 228.8 hectares against 222.3 hectares in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Equatorial Guinea and Zambia?
- 6.5 hectares, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zambia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Zambia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 59th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.