Cambodia vs Serbia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver

Cambodia
96.68 hectares
in 2024
Serbia
98.45 hectares
in 2024
Cambodia rank
90th
Serbia rank
87th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time

  • Cambodia
  • Serbia
0100200300400200120122024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 98.45 hectares against 96.68 hectares in Cambodia, a difference of 1.77 hectares.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 90th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 172.78 hectares 32.48 hectares 140.3 hectares Cambodia
2010s 269.62 hectares 69.73 hectares 199.9 hectares Cambodia
2020s 132.36 hectares 107 hectares 25.37 hectares Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Cambodia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 98.45 hectares against 96.68 hectares in Cambodia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Cambodia and Serbia?
1.77 hectares, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Serbia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Cambodia and Serbia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
Cambodia ranks 90th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 4,195 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.