What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Palau?

0.22 hectares, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Palau?

13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Palau: Tree cover loss by dominant driver

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

2.28 hectares

in 2020

Palau

2.06 hectares

in 2024

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank

154th

Palau rank

156th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
Palau

How they compare

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 2.28 hectares against 2.06 hectares in Palau, a difference of 0.22 hectares.

That makes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba's figure about 1.1 times Palau's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Palau ahead.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 154th and Palau ranks 156th of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba	Palau	Difference	Ahead
2000s	1.89 hectares	3.06 hectares	1.18 hectares	Palau
2010s	0.8224 hectares	1.51 hectares	0.6885 hectares	Palau
2020s	2.28 hectares	1.3 hectares	0.9801 hectares	Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Palau?: Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 2.28 hectares against 2.06 hectares in Palau as of 2020.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Palau?: 0.22 hectares, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Palau?: 13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Palau rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?: Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 154th and Palau ranks 156th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Palau: Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid, drawing on Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/palau/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Palau: Tree cover loss by dominant driver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Unit: hectares
Source: Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 186 places, 4,195 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 18 September 2026

Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.