Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Curacao: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2.28
in 2020
Curacao
1.58
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
154th
Curacao rank
157th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
- Curacao
How they compare
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 2.28 against 1.58 in Curacao, a difference of 0.7.
That makes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba's figure about 1.4 times Curacao's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 154th and Curacao ranks 157th of 186 countries.
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba | Curacao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.89 | 1.35 | 0.5335 | Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba |
| 2010s | 0.6607 | 0.5641 | 0.0966 | Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Curacao?
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 2.28 against 1.58 in Curacao as of 2020.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Curacao?
- 0.7, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Curacao?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2013.
- How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Curacao rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 154th and Curacao ranks 157th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.