Bahamas vs New Zealand: Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Bahamas
101.58
in 2024
New Zealand
99.42
in 2024
Bahamas rank
84th
New Zealand rank
86th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time
- Bahamas
- New Zealand
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 101.58 against 99.42 in New Zealand, a difference of 2.16.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Zealand ahead.
Bahamas ranks 84th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 186 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 190.69 | 321.12 | 130.43 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 87.18 | 230.49 | 143.31 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 101.74 | 147.29 | 45.55 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Bahamas or New Zealand?
- Bahamas, at 101.58 against 99.42 in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Bahamas and New Zealand?
- 2.16, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and New Zealand rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
- Bahamas ranks 84th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.