Angola vs Liberia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver

Angola
365.24 hectares
in 2024
Liberia
359.02 hectares
in 2024
Angola rank
41st
Liberia rank
42nd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver over time

  • Angola
  • Liberia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200120122024

How they compare

Angola currently reports 365.24 hectares against 359.02 hectares in Liberia, a difference of 6.22 hectares.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 41st and Liberia ranks 42nd of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Liberia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Liberia Difference Ahead
2000s 898.05 hectares 407.38 hectares 490.67 hectares Angola
2010s 992.43 hectares 650.44 hectares 341.99 hectares Angola
2020s 352.64 hectares 433.91 hectares 81.27 hectares Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, Angola or Liberia?
Angola, at 365.24 hectares against 359.02 hectares in Liberia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver between Angola and Liberia?
6.22 hectares, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Liberia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Angola and Liberia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver?
Angola ranks 41st and Liberia ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 4,195 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss due to the expansion and intensification of roads, settlements, urban areas, or other built infrastructure.