Serbia vs South Sudan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Serbia
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
South Sudan
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Serbia rank
97th
South Sudan rank
99th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Serbia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in South Sudan, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Sudan ahead.
Serbia ranks 97th and South Sudan ranks 99th of 173 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Serbia or South Sudan?
- Serbia, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Serbia and South Sudan?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Serbia and South Sudan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Serbia ranks 97th and South Sudan ranks 99th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.