Mauritius vs Peru: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Mauritius
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2014
Peru
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mauritius rank
92nd
Peru rank
94th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Mauritius
- Peru
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Peru, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 92nd and Peru ranks 94th of 173 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Mauritius or Peru?
- Mauritius, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Peru as of 2014.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Mauritius and Peru?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Peru?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Peru rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Mauritius ranks 92nd and Peru ranks 94th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.