Mauritius vs Mexico: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Mauritius
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2014
Mexico
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mauritius rank
92nd
Mexico rank
95th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Mauritius
- Mexico
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Mexico, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 92nd and Mexico ranks 95th of 173 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Mauritius or Mexico?
- Mauritius, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Mexico as of 2014.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Mauritius and Mexico?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Mexico?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Mexico rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Mauritius ranks 92nd and Mexico ranks 95th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.