Lithuania vs South Sudan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Lithuania
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
South Sudan
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Lithuania rank
100th
South Sudan rank
99th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Lithuania
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Sudan ahead.
Lithuania ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 99th of 173 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Lithuania or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Lithuania as of 2015.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Lithuania and South Sudan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Lithuania ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 99th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.