Libya vs Mongolia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Libya
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mongolia
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Libya rank
158th
Mongolia rank
156th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Libya
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Libya, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 158th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 173 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Libya or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Libya and Mongolia?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mongolia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2012.
- How do Libya and Mongolia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Libya ranks 158th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.