Latvia vs Sweden: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sweden
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
64th
Sweden rank
65th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Sweden
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Sweden, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 64th and Sweden ranks 65th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Sweden?
- Latvia, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Sweden?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 64th and Sweden ranks 65th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.