Ethiopia vs Sweden: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Ethiopia
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sweden
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ethiopia rank
68th
Sweden rank
65th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Ethiopia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Ethiopia, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 65th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Ethiopia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Ethiopia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Ethiopia and Sweden?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Ethiopia and Sweden rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Ethiopia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 65th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.