Egypt vs Somalia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Egypt
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Somalia
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Egypt rank
162nd
Somalia rank
164th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Egypt
- Somalia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Somalia, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Somalia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Somalia ahead.
Egypt ranks 162nd and Somalia ranks 164th of 173 countries.
Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Somalia |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Somalia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Egypt or Somalia?
- Egypt, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Somalia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Egypt and Somalia?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Somalia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Egypt and Somalia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Egypt ranks 162nd and Somalia ranks 164th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.