Egypt vs Malta: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Egypt
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2013
Egypt rank
162nd
Malta rank
161st
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Egypt
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Egypt, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 162nd and Malta ranks 161st of 173 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Egypt |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Egypt or Malta?
- Malta, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Egypt as of 2013.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Egypt and Malta?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2013.
- How do Egypt and Malta rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Egypt ranks 162nd and Malta ranks 161st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.