How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Sweden: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP

Ecuador

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Sweden

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Ecuador rank

66th

Sweden rank

65th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time

Ecuador
Sweden

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Ecuador, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 66th and Sweden ranks 65th of 173 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Sweden
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Ecuador or Sweden?: Sweden, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Ecuador and Sweden?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?: Ecuador ranks 66th and Sweden ranks 65th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sweden: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/sweden/">Ecuador vs Sweden: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 173 places, 3,890 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.