What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP

Congo

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Congo rank

20th

Equatorial Guinea rank

17th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time

Congo
Equatorial Guinea

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Congo ranks 20th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 17th of 173 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Equatorial Guinea	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?: Equatorial Guinea, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?: Congo ranks 20th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 17th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 173 places, 3,890 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.