What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Suriname ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Suriname: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP

Democratic Republic of Congo

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Suriname

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Democratic Republic of Congo rank

5th

Suriname rank

4th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time

Democratic Republic of Congo
Suriname

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 5th and Suriname ranks 4th of 173 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Democratic Republic of Congo	Suriname	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Democratic Republic of Congo or Suriname?: Suriname, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?: Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 5th and Suriname ranks 4th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Suriname: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/suriname/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Suriname: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 173 places, 3,890 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.