China vs Russia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
China
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Russia
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
72nd
Russia rank
75th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Russia
How they compare
China currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Russia, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Russia ahead.
China ranks 72nd and Russia ranks 75th of 173 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Russia |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Russia |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, China or Russia?
- China, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Russia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between China and Russia?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Russia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do China and Russia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 72nd and Russia ranks 75th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.