Chile vs South Korea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Chile
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
South Korea
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
111th
South Korea rank
108th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Chile
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 111th and South Korea ranks 108th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | South Korea |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Chile or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Chile and South Korea?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Korea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Chile and South Korea rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 111th and South Korea ranks 108th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.