Bhutan vs Ghana: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Bhutan
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ghana
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bhutan rank
6th
Ghana rank
7th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Bhutan
- Ghana
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Ghana, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ghana ahead.
Bhutan ranks 6th and Ghana ranks 7th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Bhutan or Ghana?
- Bhutan, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Bhutan and Ghana?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ghana?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Ghana rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Bhutan ranks 6th and Ghana ranks 7th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.