Belgium vs Moldova: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Belgium
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Moldova
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belgium rank
129th
Moldova rank
128th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time
- Belgium
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Moldova ahead.
Belgium ranks 129th and Moldova ranks 128th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Moldova |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Belgium or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Belgium and Moldova?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Moldova?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Moldova rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Belgium ranks 129th and Moldova ranks 128th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.