How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Rwanda?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP

Belarus

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Rwanda

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Belarus rank

56th

Rwanda rank

54th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time

Belarus
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.

Belarus ranks 56th and Rwanda ranks 54th of 173 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Belarus
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Belarus or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Belarus and Rwanda?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Rwanda?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Rwanda rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?: Belarus ranks 56th and Rwanda ranks 54th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/rwanda/">Belarus vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 173 places, 3,890 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.